Nuclear Now

Nuclear Now

Explores the possibility for the global community to overcome challenges like climate change and reach a brighter future through the power of nuclear energy.

  • Released: 2023-04-28
  • Runtime: 106 minutes
  • Genre: Documentaries
  • Stars:
  • Director: Oliver Stone
 Comments
  • marcobrcc - 3 December 2023
    Be wary
    Keep in mind that this documentary is fully founded and promoted by a company specialized in the construction of nuclear reactors (Newcleo). The primary focus of this recently (2021) created organization is to advocate for the construction of new nuclear reactors and to influence energy policies across Europe, such as in Italy, where nuclear energy is presently prohibited.

    Newcleo, in the next 7-8 years, plans to develop two reactors in France and the United Kingdom, with a non-nuclear prototype in the study phase in Italy. Additionally, they intend to establish a nuclear fuel factory producing mixed plutonium-uranium oxides (MOX). The concept for the MOX facility emerged after the conflict in Ukraine, driven by the demand for radioactive fuel independent of uranium sourced from Russia, one of the world's major producers. The company will require capital in the range of 3-4 billion euros to accomplish these endeavors. For these reasons, probably, they have produced a documentary to support their cause, shift public opinion on the subject and seek funding.

    Throughout the entire duration of the documentary, not a single mention is made of any drawbacks associated with nuclear energy. Is nuclear energy so flawless that it possesses no disadvantages? Not quite. For instance, uranium mining causes lung cancer in large numbers of miners because uranium mines contain natural radon gas, some of whose decay products are carcinogenic. Clean, renewable energy does not have this risk because (a) it does not require the continuous mining of any material, only one-time mining to produce the energy generators; and (b) the mining does not carry the same lung cancer risk that uranium mining does. Additionally, uranium, the fuel for nuclear reactors, is energy-intensive to mine, and deposits discovered in the future are likely to be harder to access. As a result, much of the net energy created would be offset by the energy input required to build and decommission plants and to mine and process uranium ore. Then there's the significant issue of nuclear waste, which is only superficially addressed. New storage systems are being designed, but a completely safe and efficient 100% solution has not been found yet.

    I am not against nuclear energy, but I would like to hear a more impartial and objective perspective on the topic, or at least hear the opposing viewpoint before drawing my conclusions.
  • bhoundproductions - 11 June 2023
    Joe Rogan recommended
    I don't know what the advertisement process is for documentary films, but I heard about this film on Joe Rogan's podcast. #1992 with the director Oliver Stone. And it did not disappoint. It's Oliver Stone, so the quality of the film is not in question. I really liked how the film acknowledges the potential for the viewer to have bias, based on Hollywood version of events. And then helps the viewer walk through actual facts. At the End, I think I'm with everyone that can't wait for the Next Version of Technology for power what ever that night be (crashed UFO secrets???). But until then because the issue is so important. We need to proceed on facts and not disillusioned beliefs.